Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 August 2013 15:04, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 > schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > >> I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, >> removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. >> >> This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any >> prob

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-23 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, > removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. > > This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any > problems causecd by this update? Do you have any uncommit

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-23 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:34:39 +0200 schrieb Iain Buclaw : > > Make Don aware of this. But looks ok to me. Does it fail in the same > way for double on x86/x86_64? If I modify frexp to use double instead of real it also fails on x86 in the same way: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72725240 But the double

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-22 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 22 August 2013 20:45, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 > schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > >> I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, >> removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. >> >> This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any >> prob

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-22 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, > removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. > > This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any > problems causecd by this update? > > Thanks > Iain. I di

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-20 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 20 August 2013 10:57, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 20 August 2013 10:07, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 >> schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : >> >>> I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, >>> removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. >>> >>> This passes for

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-20 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 20 August 2013 10:07, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 > schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > >> I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, >> removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. >> >> This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any >> prob

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-20 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:33:14 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, > removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. > > This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any > problems causecd by this update? > > Thanks > Iain. I fo

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-18 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 18 August 2013 15:27, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 18 August 2013 09:54, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:38:08 +0200 >> schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : >> >>> On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 16:33:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> > I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, >>>

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-18 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 18 August 2013 09:54, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:38:08 +0200 > schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > >> On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 16:33:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> > I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, >> > removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. >> > >>

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-18 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:38:08 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 16:33:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, > > removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. > > > > This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please r

Re: ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-16 Thread Iain Buclaw
On Friday, 16 August 2013 at 16:33:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any problems causecd by this update? Thanks Iain. Commit referen

ARM testers, make note.

2013-08-16 Thread Iain Buclaw
I've pushed in pure implementations of functions in std.math, removing the workaround in core.stdc.math. This passes for x64/x32. Can any ARM testers please report any problems causecd by this update? Thanks Iain.