Re: [Projects] Review of GDC frontend components for 2.066 merge.

2014-08-11 Thread Trent Forkert via D.gnu
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote: > > On 11 Aug 2014 06:25, "Trent Forkert via D.gnu" > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu < > d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've been turning around the idea in my head to start

Re: [Projects] Review of GDC frontend components for 2.066 merge.

2014-08-11 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 11 Aug 2014 06:25, "Trent Forkert via D.gnu" wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu < d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've been turning around the idea in my head to start removing aspects of the D frontend from GDC as each part is converted into the more

Re: [Projects] Review of GDC frontend components for 2.066 merge.

2014-08-10 Thread ketmar via D.gnu
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:25:40 + "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" wrote: > Potential files up for deletion include: > - doc.c: Because people should be using the (far) superior DDox > [1]. oh, no, please leave docs module! that was the thing that helps me to actually write documentation for my code. i

Re: [Projects] Review of GDC frontend components for 2.066 merge.

2014-08-10 Thread Trent Forkert via D.gnu
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote: > Hi, > > I've been turning around the idea in my head to start removing aspects of > the D frontend from GDC as each part is converted into the more > modular/pluggable Visitor interface. > > Some initial thoughts are along the lines

[Projects] Review of GDC frontend components for 2.066 merge.

2014-07-27 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
Hi, I've been turning around the idea in my head to start removing aspects of the D frontend from GDC as each part is converted into the more modular/pluggable Visitor interface. Some initial thoughts are along the lines of, remove the extraneous tooling components that we have on offer in D