[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-06-07 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-31 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 --- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to thomas.bockman from comment #8) > > Well, I can make it a candidate for 2.067 > > That would be appreciated. > > Don't bother if it looks like it will be too much work though; I only filed > this

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-31 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 --- Comment #8 from thomas.bock...@gmail.com --- > Well, I can make it a candidate for 2.067 That would be appreciated. Don't bother if it looks like it will be too much work though; I only filed this because I figured that just adding it to the

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-31 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 --- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw --- Well, I can make it a candidate for 2.067 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-31 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 --- Comment #6 from thomas.bock...@gmail.com --- > That says there's something more wrong going on about you than the compiler. Let me fix that for you: > That says there's something more wrong going on about DMD than GDC. For checkedint I achi

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-31 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw --- Every function? That says there's something more wrong going on about you than the compiler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-31 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 --- Comment #4 from thomas.bock...@gmail.com --- > What about moving the pragma inside the function? That way does work, although only with the `version` guard. Adding such a block to every. single. function. that needs to be inlined is actually

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-30 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 Daniel Murphy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from D

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-29 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 thomas.bock...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVE

[Bug 205] Add pragma(inline) to the grammar

2016-01-29 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205 thomas.bock...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--