http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
--- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw ---
There seems to be a key thing happening here:
---
struct SignalImpl
{
@disable this(this); // SignalImpl is now non-POD
}
---
Because of this, TypeFunction::toCtype sets TREE_ADDRESSABLE on functions
ret
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Reduced:
---
struct SignalImpl
{
@disable this(this);
}
struct RestrictedSignal
{
SignalImpl mImpl;
void connect() { }
}
struct Signal
{
RestrictedSignal mRestricted;
}
class MyObject
{
S
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail b
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
--- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark ---
also, adding 'final' either to `ref RestrictedSignal!(string, int) valueChanged
()` or to `@property void value (int v)` fixes the code too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug ch
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
--- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark ---
p.p.s. i'm using GCC 4.9.2 and the corresponding HEAD branch of gdc on x86.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--- Comment #1 fro
