http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Bleh, lets just say worksforme.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
--- Comment #5 from Ketmar Dark ---
this bug disappeared in current gdc 4.9, so i think that it can be closed as
"unconfirmed", 'cause even I can't reproduce it anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark ---
just build jsvar.d, and then my main.d with -O2 — and you'll get segfault. it's
not heisenbug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
--- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark ---
sorry, i can't reduce it to small sample. but it's surely reproducable with
83b13e and gcc 4.9. i can attach that jsvar.d too (but it's really stock one
from git) and anything you need to reproduce it. note tha
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
I can't say I can reproduce this problem easily.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--- Comment #1 fro
