http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #9 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de ---
Do you have some timeline? I'd like to see it reviewed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #8 from Manu ---
Fair enough. Although it's a direct abstraction for most operations, so no
overheads. Some algorithms which aren't supported by certain architectures need
to be emulated however.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #7 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de ---
Thanks for the reply. Sorry I'm fairly new to this low-level programming.
I'm looking forward to std.simd. Currently I familiarize myself with this kind
of programming. I believe std.simd will be a hu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Manu from comment #5)
> Might I suggest that std.simd exists to wrangle the difference between
> compilers (and arch/platforms).
> It's on dub, or my github. I'll finish it up when I have all the t
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
Manu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||turkey...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Manu ---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
Quote from (Updated code example for D)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-06/msg00237.html
"""
The __builtin_ia32_loadaps builtin function was removed and the
documentation is out of date. The movaps instr
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
There is no __builtin_ia32_loadaps in GCC either.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #2 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de ---
There is no __builtin_ia32_loadaps with my gdc. I'm using the latest binaries.
Is this to be expected? Probably I'm doing something wrong. I cannot find it in
the generated builtins.di and gdc says
err
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
__simd requires the compiler to expose D_SIMD. Which is not implemented in
GDC. And given the nature of the intrinsic, I can't see it ever being
introduced.
To access SIMD instructions, instead use the gcc.b
10 matches
Mail list logo
