Steve Teale wrote:
> After some time, I have finally got GDC (DMD 2.015) to build and
compile
> Phobos2 with GCC-4.4.3.
Hi,
can you please publish your efforts of make gdc running on 4.4.3? So we
can merge with the main branch.
Thanks.
Everyone who wants to collaborate please start downloading the gdc code
following these instructions:
http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home
And then start hacking it. Please remember that compilers are the most
complex piece of software that a human can do, so don't give up when you
find
/gdc/wiki/RepositoryGuidelines and contact me to
have write rights on the repo. Then ping us on IRC or write down proposals
in bitbucket as "issues".
:)
Hope it all helps.
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
Steve Teale wrote:
> Oh! So you are goshawk. I have some questions about building GDC2, is
it
> OK if I email you?
of course
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
gcc backend. After we reach that goal we can start thinking to
further plans.
I'm here if you have more questions or suggestions :)
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
Steve Teale wrote:
> The following produces a segfault with GDC - works OK with DMD on same
> machine. Where do I report it?
Hi,
Poste it here please: http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issues/
But i don't guarantee that i can work on it ATM.
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (gos
ings in D2 may change completely very soon due to unstable
language specs. In the next months the "path to follow" will be more
clear...
See you.
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
z nobody, of the
dev team, has a mac. So we are unable to test and develop a binary for
that environment.
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
s and
resources :)
As soon as a relevant goal is reached (as gcc 4.4.x support) we will
do a release (according to David of course!).
See you.
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
#x27;t proceded in distributing any .deb or tarball cuz i hope to
finish the gcc 4.4 port anytime soon... ;)
In any case, if you feel interested in this topic, you can contribute
as well testing that script and say us if it produces a good tarball
or not ;)
See you.
--
Vincenzo Ampo
.015. I've tested the d2 version on 64 bit and it works. I didn't
test any compatibility with tango for now...
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
s case, modifying a large file of all tests can be
painful.
See you :D
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
the gdc project.
See you.
--
Vincenzo Ampolo (goshawk)
http://goshawknest.wordpress.com
Hi,
This is mainly a message to Walter, Andrei and all the people involved in
dmd and phobos.
As you maybe heard, there have been some commits about the gdc compiler
and in my previous mail in the NG i announced the complete merge of dmd
1.039 and 2.015.
We have a problem now, we don't know ho
dolive wrote:
> gdc will support windows ?
I think it's too early to speak about a windows version, although a
people in #d.gdc manifested interested, his nickname is eldar.
gdc on windows could run under mingw, but for mingw, gdc needs to
support gcc 4.4.x (we are at 4.3.x now)
It's planned
Hi all,
After some weeks of work from last announce in this newsgroup we have
nice news to share.
Few seconds ago, Michael has updated the trunk of the project with the
dmd 1.038... so... there are still few versions to merge to reach the
current 1.045 ;)
Please mind that these versions are no
Michael P. wrote:
> I fixed it. :)
> The problem actually wasn't in math.d.
> There was lots of asm in math.d, and in ExtAsmStatement, in
statement.h,
> the blockExit function wasn't added to the interface, because it
does not
> get included in the diffs. Because of that, the blockExit from
St
Michael P. wrote:
> GDC compiles, but it doesn't work. When you try to compile, it gives a
> bunch of undefined reference errors to std.math functions. So I would
> assume the problem is somewhere in math.d.
Yep, since math.d is not included in phobos with the change you did,
functions doesn't
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
> If tests will be good, i'll commit
> the changes.
>
Tests went good :)
gosh...@earth:/tmp/test/usr/local/gcc-4.3/bin$ ./gdc ~/test.d
gosh...@earth:/tmp/test/usr/local/gcc-4.3/bin$ ./a.out
Hello World, Reloaded
gosh...@earth:/tmp/test/usr/local/gcc-4.3
Michael P. wrote:
> Yeah, I got it working with the 4.3.1 branch.
After some libphobos2 hacks in commenting some functions which caused
compiler errors, i successfully compiled gdc D2 with phobos 2. I didn't
test yet if it works with an example. If tests will be good, i'll commit
the changes.
Michael P. wrote:
> I'll get the sources up ASAP.
I got gdc compiling on 4.1.2...
So since you are working in bumping the dmd version, i'll work in bumping
gcc version to 4.2 and then 4.3 :D
Is it ok?
Michael P. wrote:
> bitbucket to avoid breaking terms of the GPL? It looked like all I
have to
> do was ship gpl.txt, and credit the original author. But I want to
make
> sure.
>
With gpl you ahve the freedom to copy, modify and distribute the
modified copy.
So you can put it on bitbucket fo
Michael P. wrote:
> I managed to get the front end to DMD 1.031 working with GDC.
Done! :D
Have a look here
http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/overview/
And if you want publish a complete version of the sources. If you just
found that applying patches it works i'll help soon :D
Michael P. wrote:
> I managed to get the front end to DMD 1.031 working with GDC.
Great news, did you publish it somewhere?
If not tell me that i'll set up a repository on bitbuket.org
See you ;)
And thanks for your work!
Michael you are doing a very good work :)
I don't have time to collaborate now but i could have it in the future.
What i can suggest you to do is:
1) stay on irc.freenode.net #d.gdc to meet other people interested in
gdc.
2) publish your work in a RCS. i suggest you to use http://bitbucket.org/
25 matches
Mail list logo
