Am 08.01.2011 08:47, schrieb "Jérôme M. Berger":
scorn wrote:
Am 06.01.2011 20:20, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
== Quote from scorn (sc...@d.net)'s article
Am 05.01.2011 21:24, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
== Quote from Scorn (sc...@scorn.net)'s article
I too wonder how much work it
Am 06.01.2011 20:20, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
== Quote from scorn (sc...@d.net)'s article
Am 05.01.2011 21:24, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
== Quote from Scorn (sc...@scorn.net)'s article
I too wonder how much work it would be to support OpenMP in gdc. From
http://www.drdobbs.com/high-p
Am 05.01.2011 21:24, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
== Quote from Scorn (sc...@scorn.net)'s article
I too wonder how much work it would be to support OpenMP in gdc. From
http://www.drdobbs.com/high-performance-computing/226300277 it seems to be that
there is also quite a lot of magic on the compiler
I too wonder how much work it would be to support OpenMP in gdc. From
http://www.drdobbs.com/high-performance-computing/226300277 it seems to be that
there is also quite a lot of magic on the compiler side (but which could already
be in the gcc parts). Maybe a concurrent garbage collector would als
