Just to let everyone know, I haven't forgot about GDC. I have just been busy
lately.
I plan to fix bugs that people have submitted patches for.(Thanks to those who
have made the patches)
After that, I hope to merge in a new D front end, 1.047.
-Michael P.
Steve Teale Wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:38:29 -0400, Michael P. wrote:
>
> > Steve Teale Wrote:
> >
> >> After some time, I have finally got GDC (DMD 2.015) to build and
> >> compile Phobos2 with GCC-4.4.3.
> >>
> >> So far I have
Steve Teale Wrote:
> After some time, I have finally got GDC (DMD 2.015) to build and compile
> Phobos2 with GCC-4.4.3.
>
> So far I have only built and run hello world, and a couple of small test
> programs I made to investigate problems I had patching GCC.
>
> However, it's a start.
>
> Wha
xed,
just mention it here, and I'll do my best.
Please make sure that they are still relevant though, as I'm sure some may no
longer be relevant.
-Michael P.
Joseph Wakeling Wrote:
> Small query about GDC and its 'home' on the web. All the references to GDC
> on the Digital Mars D page at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/ point to the
> Sourceforge page which has shown no signs of life for 2+ years now. Is there
> a project page for the current active
Daniel Green Wrote:
> Recently I tried compiling goshawk's gdc,1.045 at the moment, for
> Windows using TDM's GCC/mingw32 patches and build files. When I started
> I chose Cygwin as an environment because the MinGW website was down at
> the time. The compiler has been successfully built and t
Steve Teale Wrote:
> Michael P. Wrote:
>
> > Steve Teale Wrote:
> >
> > > Anders, Michael, could you possibly post a summary of who does what with
> > > respect to GDC.
> > >
> > > There's clearly quite a bit of work going on, but i
Steve Teale Wrote:
> Anders, Michael, could you possibly post a summary of who does what with
> respect to GDC.
>
> There's clearly quite a bit of work going on, but it is difficult to pull
> together a picture of what is happening.
>
> It would be useful if contact information for the parties
Steve Teale Wrote:
> Michael P. Wrote:
>
> > Just to let everyone now, I have got 1.041 as the latest front end now.
> > Yipee!
> > Still don't think it's working with 4.3.4, but I haven't tested it. Has
> > only been tested on 4.1.2 on my Ubuntu
revcompgeek Wrote:
> On 12/27/09 9:52 AM, Michael P. wrote:
> > revcompg...@gmail.com Wrote:
> >
> >> So I tried building Tango trunk a while ago, and it actually built
> >> surprisingly well, with only one small error I was able to fix. So I
> >> install
revcompg...@gmail.com Wrote:
> So I tried building Tango trunk a while ago, and it actually built
> surprisingly well, with only one small error I was able to fix. So I
> installed the tango library and proceeded to test if tango was really
> working. So in hello.d:
>
> import tango.io.Stdout;
well.
There is some more about this in the README file in d/samples/README.
If anyone has any suggestions on things to add, how I should run the test, etc,
feel free to say something.
Here is where you can check:
http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home
-Michael P.
Dejan Lekic Wrote:
> Great, Michael! \o/ Keep up with good work!
>
> Are you, by any chance, working on support for some newer D2?
>
> Kind regards
More of goshawk's thing ATM.
When I do catch up to the latest D1 releases, I might start to work on D2
though.
dsimcha Wrote:
> == Quote from Michael P. (baseball@gmail.com)'s article
> > Just to let everyone now, I have got 1.041 as the latest front end now.
> > Yipee!
> > Still don't think it's working with 4.3.4, but I haven't tested it. Has only
> b
Just to let everyone now, I have got 1.041 as the latest front end now. Yipee!
Still don't think it's working with 4.3.4, but I haven't tested it. Has only
been tested on 4.1.2 on my Ubuntu 9.10 system. I'll try to get that fixed soon.
Will probably have to ask GCC devs about that. Anyone know of
Anders F Björklund Wrote:
> Back in Jan 2007 when DMD 1.00 was released,
> GDC 0.21 had support for the current platforms.
> Before the D conference Aug 2007 and DMD 1.020,
> there was GDC 0.24 and the gdc installers for:
>
> http://dgcc.sourceforge.net/ Source/Binary tgz
> http://gdcwin.sourcefo
Vincenzo Ampolo Wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Today i received a very good mail which stated that what we are doing
> in developing gdc is appreciated.
>
> The mail is from Tomasz Stachewicz, the developer of RuDy project to
> enable and ease writing Ruby native extensions in D programming
> language
Vincenzo Ampolo Wrote:
> Hi,
> This is mainly a message to Walter, Andrei and all the people involved in
> dmd and phobos.
>
> As you maybe heard, there have been some commits about the gdc compiler
> and in my previous mail in the NG i announced the complete merge of dmd
> 1.039 and 2.015.
>
Vincenzo Ampolo Wrote:
> Michael P. wrote:
>
> > GDC compiles, but it doesn't work. When you try to compile, it gives a
> > bunch of undefined reference errors to std.math functions. So I would
> > assume the problem is somewhere in math.d.
>
> Yep, since ma
Michael P. Wrote:
> Hey, I have been doing work on GDC to try and get it updated to a later DMD
> front end.
> I have been doing it incrementally, and am currently trying to do
> 1.031-1.032. I have had some problems, like not being able to find a
> reference to "util_pr
Hey, I have been doing work on GDC to try and get it updated to a later DMD
front end.
I have been doing it incrementally, and am currently trying to do 1.031-1.032.
I have had some problems, like not being able to find a reference to
"util_progress"(is it in the DMD backend?), so I just comment
Moritz Warning Wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:20:46 +0200, Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
>
> > Michael P. wrote:
> >
> >> I'll get the sources up ASAP.
> >
> > I got gdc compiling on 4.1.2...
> > So since you are working in bumping the dmd versio
Vincenzo Ampolo Wrote:
> Michael P. wrote:
>
> > I managed to get the front end to DMD 1.031 working with GDC.
>
> Done! :D
>
> Have a look here
> http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/overview/
>
> And if you want publish a complete version of the sources. I
Vincenzo Ampolo Wrote:
> Michael you are doing a very good work :)
>
> I don't have time to collaborate now but i could have it in the future.
> What i can suggest you to do is:
>
> 1) stay on irc.freenode.net #d.gdc to meet other people interested in
> gdc.
> 2) publish your work in a RCS. i
Yahoo!
I managed to get the front end to DMD 1.031 working with GDC.
What I did was creating patch files for the DMD 1.030 front end, and the front
end that was used with GDC. Then, going through all of the files in the DMD
1.031 front end, I made the changes that were shown in the patch files.
H
I found a pretty useful link about writing a GCC front-end here:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/GCC-Frontend-HOWTO.html
It describes how to write a demo front-end language for GCC.
Since D's is already written, and all I have to work on is merging the DMD
source, it shouldn't be too hard. Just wanted to se
Hey, I want to help out with GDC. I don't know a ton about D, but I've got lots
of time to learn, and I think that I would be able to help improve GDC.
Right now, I'm pretty sure that the GDC svn is at DMD 1.030, and works with GCC
4.1.x.
So, I'm trying to merge the DMD frontend source of DMD int
27 matches
Mail list logo
