On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 11:19:21 UTC, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:44:20 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
My point being that for the majority of people, the ones that
work on open source projects, large projects, productions for
the
masses, a stable lang
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 12:20:01 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
D.gnu wrote:
On 27 September 2014 13:11, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:47:33 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
I don't think that the gcc team is slow on releasing new
releases
and patches
they
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 12:12:08 UTC, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:47:33 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
I don't think that the gcc team is slow on releasing new
releases and patches
they are much slower than D team.
I think that on one hand it&#
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 22:21:13 UTC, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:53:58 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
I wonder if there are plans to add the support for D in the
official releases of gcc .
it's good as the "sign of official acceptance", but
I wonder if there are plans to add the support for D in the
official releases of gcc .
My question is more about simplifying logistics, I already have
different versions of different compilers in my system, and been
able to avoid building yet another set of compilers ( different
versions of g
