Re: Support for gcc vector attributes, SIMD builtins

Iain Buclaw Wrote: > == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article > > I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around > > with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of optimization > > the code generator did with it. It was able to partia

Re: Adding gdc to gcc

Walter Bright Wrote: > Iain Buclaw wrote: > > == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article > >> I posted the question on this list: > >> > > http://www.listware.net/201011/gcc-gcc/25881-merging-gdc-gnu-d-compiler-into-gcc.html > >> hopefully we can move forward with this. > >

Re: D compiler as part of GCC

Steve Teale Wrote: > > In general is there interest in this project, especially contributing to > > it? > > > > Did anything come of this and the ensuing discussions? At the moment, Walter is considering it. Beyond that I don't know and don't want to put words in anyone's mouth. I've been pl

Re: D compiler as part of GCC

Simen kjaeraas Wrote: > Jerry Quinn wrote: > > > One question I have (of many) is whether a different name should be > > used. If this is called GDC there will be some confusion with the > > current GDC. What thoughts do you all have? > > If the project is t

D compiler as part of GCC

Hi, folks, I'm interested in creating a D front end for GCC that would be part of the GCC codebase. My feeling is that a GDC that is part of GCC distributions will likely have more life than one that must be updated whenever a new GCC release comes out. As with linux kernel in-tree drivers be