On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:33:07 +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> First and last work here (then again, I'm prodding with a
> distribution-patched copy of dragonegg here). Second segfaults, but
> looks to be a problem with the plugin, rather than anything gdc could
> do.
>
> Anyway, enough distraction for
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:27 +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:25:24 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> > So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried it with DragonEgg
>> > t
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:25:24 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried it with DragonEgg
> though (first time I've heard about it too).
I compiled both gdc and dragonegg together cleanly, which is nice that
the patches they both required to gcc-4.5.2 don't
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:31:14 +, dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article
>> Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? Or even better,
>> already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the LLVM plugin).
>> I know about LDC2 of c
Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance?
Or even better, already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the LLVM
plugin).
I know about LDC2 of course, but DragonEgg would obviate the need for it
because DragonEgg makes LLVM codegen a plugin to the GCC framework.
If not I may try to get t
