Re: Is GDC a solid option versus LDC?

2022-03-04 Thread H. S. Teoh via D.gnu
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:52:10PM +, rempas via D.gnu wrote: > On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 15:26:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: [...] > > The only difference is that GDC, being a part of the GCC project, is > > tied to the GCC release cycle, so it tends to lag behind DMD and LDC > > in terms of the

Re: Is GDC a solid option versus LDC?

2022-03-04 Thread H. S. Teoh via D.gnu
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:05:36PM +, rempas via D.gnu wrote: > From what I know, most people (if not all), seem to prefer LDC over > GDC. When it comes to C, I always prefer GCC as GCC's backend > compiles code faster and also produces code will run faster than LLVM > (even if the differences

Re: GDC release cycle

2019-09-30 Thread H. S. Teoh via D.gnu
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:00:48PM +, Sjoerd Nijboer via D.gnu wrote: > I was wondering what the schedule for the GDC release is, since GDC is > quite a bit behind on the dlang frontend version. > Is it a release whenever a couple new major D features appear? A new > release when there's a bugf

Re: Phobos differences?

2015-10-23 Thread H. S. Teoh via D.gnu
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:27:30PM +, Alex Parrill via D.gnu wrote: > I've noticed that GDC's version of Phobos is missing some features > from DMD's. Is there a place to report this, and is it possible to, in > the meantime, use DMD's Phobos? > > Here's some of the things I've noticed in part