Quick dumb question:
I just installed gdc on ubuntu from apt. Which version of the dmd
front end does it use?
gdc --version
gives me
gdc (Ubuntu 4.8.5-2ubuntu1~14.04.1) 4.8.5
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
The
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 13:48:16 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
Am Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:14:48 +
schrieb Ellery Newcomer :
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 08:53:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Instead of funneling blame, this could be resolved in the
> move
> to 2.067
&
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 08:53:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Instead of funneling blame, this could be resolved in the move
to 2.067
(maybe just skipping to 2.068). The complete
The warning still appears in dmd 2.069. Do you recommend filing a
bug with dmd?
Anybody have any idea what's going on here?
https://travis-ci.org/ariovistus/pyd/jobs/90001785
basically, its running
gdc -c temp.o (d files..)
and its giving
Error: symbol
`_D4util11multi_index276__T19MultiIndexContainerTC4core6thread6ThreadTS4util11multi_index127__T9IndexedByS1094util11mul
On 12/30/2013 12:22 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Sorry, I forgot that the paths are different for cross-compilers. It
should
be
/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/lib/gcc/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/4.8.2/include/d/gcc/libbacktrace.di
Just to be sure: You also don't get a backtrace with symbols even if
On 12/21/2013 04:04 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
flags I'm using: -fdebug -g
No libbacktrace support on ARM?
Libbacktrace is actually supported on ARM and stacktraces works just
fine, even with cross-compilers. There must be a problem with your gdc
build, Ellery. Can you check the contents of
in
On 12/15/2013 12:45 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
You can use 'strip' (arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-strip) to get your 11MB
hello world to a reasonable size.
right.
stack traces are a little less than helpful:
object.Exception@src/robovero.d(82): expected length 1, got '[]'
0x25f0f
On 12/14/2013 02:21 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Hi Ellery,
it seems like crosstool-NG can't compile recent gcc-4.9 snapshots. It's
not a D or crosstool problem actually, GCC-4.9 for some reason can't
bootstrap glibc.
I personally use this branch to test the cross-compiler:
https://github.com/jpf9
On 12/09/2013 06:25 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I updated the ARM patches to the latest master version. I have to admit
I was pleasantly surprised that going from 2.063 to 2.064 did not cause
any failing test cases in the test suite or failing unit tests. So ARM
on 2.064 is also good to go now and i
On 04/06/2013 09:32 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:14:19 -0700
schrieb Ellery Newcomer :
On 04/05/2013 10:52 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Hey all.
trying to build gdc with gcc 4.7 in release mode
(--enable-checking=release, and no --disable-bootstrap, per the
general
On 04/05/2013 10:52 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Hey all.
trying to build gdc with gcc 4.7 in release mode
(--enable-checking=release, and no --disable-bootstrap, per the general
instructions), and I'm getting
gcc.o: In function `process_command(unsigned int, cl_decoded_option*)':
gc
Hey all.
trying to build gdc with gcc 4.7 in release mode
(--enable-checking=release, and no --disable-bootstrap, per the general
instructions), and I'm getting
gcc.o: In function `process_command(unsigned int, cl_decoded_option*)':
gcc.c:(.text+0x2f60): undefined reference to
`lang_specific
On 11/18/2012 03:53 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 November 2012 19:30, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
hi. is there a quick way to make the build use something like
$includedir/gdc-d instead of $includedir/d
I do intend to make this configured, but you'll have to edit a couple of files.
Make-la
hi. is there a quick way to make the build use something like
$includedir/gdc-d instead of $includedir/d
On 12/13/2011 05:10 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> That will probably be because of:
>
> PREFIX=`echo ~`/gdc3
> ...
> ./configure --prefix=$PREFIX
>
>
> gdc will look in $PREFIX/include/d2 for the import files.
>
would setting --prefix=/usr/ and then running
make install prefix=otherprefix
be a
On 12/13/2011 01:43 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 02:17 PM, F i L wrote:
>> Any chance we might see a GDC Fedora .rpm at some point? I'm relatively
>> new to Linux in general but I use Fedora because it has LDC D2 in the
>> software center and comes wi
On 12/12/2011 02:17 PM, F i L wrote:
> Any chance we might see a GDC Fedora .rpm at some point? I'm relatively
> new to Linux in general but I use Fedora because it has LDC D2 in the
> software center and comes with a clean Gnome Shell (my favorite DE) by
> default. If I had more experience I'd try
17 matches
Mail list logo
