.. and now it is in [community]
GCC 6.1.1 is currently available in [testing] and matching GDC is
in [community-testing] - both repos can be enabled in your
/etc/pacman.conf
Trying it out before they both get promoted to main repo would be
quite appreciated :)
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:58:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on packaging GDC for openSUSE, and I have a few
questions.
Is it possible to make the build process install only D related
files, for example cc1d, but not cc1?
If the above works (or I manually exclude generic
https://github.com/Dicebot/Arch-PKGBUILDs/blob/master/gdc/folders.diff
On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 04:31:17 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 12:01:05 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
My best guess is that the strings are always placed in rodata,
never in
separate sections. If you do write("x"), "x" is also in
rodata, the
rodata section can't be remove
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 12:01:05 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
So the best option is probably to get rid of this problem by
patching
the compiler (@notypeinfo or -fnortti).
Oh, sorry, I though GDC already does that when TypeInfo is never
actually used. Nevermind then, your version seems t
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 11:04:37 UTC, Mike wrote:
If you can explain the mechanics causing this, please enlighten
me. Bug? Enhancement? By design?
Random guess: can it possibly confuse template-based variadics
with runtime variadics? Latter require RTTI to work. If something
like tha
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 14:20:43 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 16:57:41 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
That's likely used/caused by the TypeInfo.name property.
Judging by what I'm seeing, I think you're right.
But I'm compiling with -fdata-sections and -Wl,--gc-sections,
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 12:31:31 UTC, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:23:44 +
"Dicebot via D.gnu" wrote:
and there is no support for 2.066 yet, it will take at least
month (or
maybe three) to land. or maybe more. ;-)
What I have expected. Some user
I have just got `gdc` Arch Linux package flagged out of date with
a comment that support for 2.066 frontend is out. Can't remember
any announcement and it seems like false alarm but just to be
extra sure - what is the most simple way to check last supported
version in repo? (4.9 branch)
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 07:25:27 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I'd also recommend to delay linux distribution package
updates but I hope that bug will be fixed soon.
Thanks for the warning, really appreciated :)
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 22:50:37 UTC, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
wrote:
However if the last conversation I had with Johannes was of any
indicator, if you hold onto your horses, you may find this
backported
to work on 4.9.x in the next weeks. :-)
Eagerly waiting for it ;)
Arch Linux has just switched to 4.9 gcc version, matching gdc
packages will be deployed shortly (building those right now).
This means one less user of 4.8 branch ;)
13 matches
Mail list logo
