On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 14:44:36 UTC, Kyle De'Vir wrote:
Also, it would be nice to officially document this somewhere.
Or is still considered an unstable feature? LDC seems to
dynamically link by default, now that I examine it.
LDC as shipped in the upstream binary packages doesn't li
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 02:26:46 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
`_Dmain` is equivalent, as I expected, but what's going on with
`main`? Anything to be concerned about?
I think these are just the getter and setter implementation
bodies. (Note that main ends with an unconditional jmp to
On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 17:29:53 UTC, Sebastien Alaiwan
wrote:
Please let me know if you think this could be a valuable tool.
I am really thrilled to see effort being put towards more testing
tools, and I'm sure that most other LDC devs are as well.
There are so many opportunities which
On Friday, 11 March 2016 at 20:50:14 UTC, Saurabh Mishra wrote:
Regarding the GSoC application, please guide me on how to get
started.
Have a look at the official GSoC student guide:
http://write.flossmanuals.net/gsocstudentguide
While the community is certainly happy to help with any specif
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 21:12:02 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
switched from LDC because i couldn't get the section attribute
working on 0.14.
LDC 0.14 is ancient at this point.
What you are looking for is @ldc.attributes.section("..."), which
is available from LDC 0.17.0:
https://wiki.dl
On Friday, 5 February 2016 at 02:48:31 UTC, Haiwei wrote:
I found there is no lineSplitter in the std/string.d in the
gdc library.
Is that a bug?
IIRC lineSplitter was only introduced in Phobos 2.067 or 2.068.
GDC probably just hasn't caught up yet.
— David
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 20:05:37 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Please don't start working on a D specific linker script, cause
I'm already working on that ;-) I've only done moduleinfo so
far, but TLS is next, then shared library support.
Instead of a fully custom linker script, I'd go for e
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 14:55:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
It should be possible if it's druntime handling all module
loading (if
you circumvent the module load handlers, don't expect it to work
properly).
eg:
loadModule(mod); // .ctors are ran and modules self register
themselves to 'mo
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 10:54:56 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
As for module discovery, we already generate this in the GDC
backend,
which makes it then the job of runtime to pick-up, sort and run
the
ctors on all modules:
@attribute("constructor")
void __modinit()
{
extern (C) __gshared Mo
On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 at 15:39:30 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
I hope I'm not talking bullshit here as I'm not 100% sure
what's meant
with 'module discovery'.
But if the question is how to get all ModuleInfos in a library,
[…]
Yes, this was the idea.
We can then access the bracket-sym
On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 at 20:07:41 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
The hidden subtext that you didn't understand being, I'm
holding back on Martin's patches for now.
That subtext isn't exactly hidden, given the first sentence in
your first post. ;)
Do you have a plan yet regarding how to imple
On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 at 19:09:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Native TLS support on linux will have to wait a while before I
get
that working... (but you could always build with --disable-tls)
Wait, so GDC doesn't (entirely) support native TLS on Linux?! Or
are you just talking about share
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 22:15:07 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I'll have to re-check this. At the last time I looked, the
interface file
generation part of the front end did not omit the bodies of
functions
defined in modules.
It does now (unless -inline is given for DMD, or
-Hkeep-all-bod
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 09:10:43 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
DMD seems to ship .d include files for druntime now, they're no
longer
shipping the .di files. The archlinux packages even do this for
gdc.
Some stuff now depends on this, as having the source code
available
allows more stuff t
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:52:29 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
LDC does not strip the library into
s/strip/split/
David
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 19:48:12 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Is there any way in which to ensure that the build splits
Phobos up into library and debugging symbols à la LDC? Could
be useful, no?
LDC does not strip the library into a release build and debugging
symbols (yet) –
On Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 17:07:14 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Now fully passing (prior to 2.063 merge).
Just curious: Does this include druntime, Phobos, exception
chaining, …?
David
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 15:07:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as
anti-spam is next to useless and it would probably not be very
beneficial to prevent people documenting from creating new
pages.
So, to sanitise the current situation but sti
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 07:58:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
void dyld_enumerate_tlv_storage(dyld_tlv_state_change_handler
handler)
If I recall correctly, LDC is using
"dyld_enumerate_tlv_storage".
Yep. It's a bit cumbersome to handle, though, as it relies on
Blocks support:
https://gith
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 12:02:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 27 May 2013 21:40, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Looks like the frontend rejects this - will find out whether
this is a
bug or intentional...
Yep, I saw that coming a mile off! >_<
I can't imagine any good reason why it shouldn't be supported.
Ju
On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 at 17:45:11 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
OT: I think a simple constructor shouldn't prevent a type from
being a
POD, but that should be defined by dmd /frontend.
I wouldn't spend too much time on implementing the old behavior -
I think I managed to convince Walter th
21 matches
Mail list logo
