On 25/02/2013 00:53, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I leave monger to Daniel, and don't really affiliate any modifications
to gcc-proper any part if gdc. However that's not to say that I don't
think his work is invaluable. :)
Can't say I know what monger is, but OK :)
I think it's horrible that you use
Hi,
I'm sure you've seen it anyway, but just in case, I wanted to draw your
attention to a 32-bit TLS bug I think I found, which only seems to
affect this version.
Details are in the "Can GDC make DLLs?" thread:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kgb15b$2o05$1...@digitalmars.com#post-kgbdu5:24b2p
On 24/02/2013 15:13, Ben Davis wrote:
I'm hitting more problems getting my DLL to start up, but I'll post
about those separately later if necessary.
That's weird. Whatever further problem I thought I was hitting, I'm not
hitting it any more. I'll put it down to user e
On 24/02/2013 09:38, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 23 Feb 2013 22:00, "Ben Davis" mailto:ent...@cantab.net>> wrote:
> I've managed to build my DLL with a replacement for dll.d, using
GCC-style inline asm for the offending block. Now I've run into another
problem. This c
On 23/02/2013 18:38, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013 6:20 PM, "Ben Davis" mailto:ent...@cantab.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone had any success using GDC to make DLLs to be called from
C/C++?
>
> The reason I ask is, for me, the following snippet in
Hi,
Has anyone had any success using GDC to make DLLs to be called from C/C++?
The reason I ask is, for me, the following snippet inside dll.d /
dll_fixTLS() seems to have compiled to a call to abort():
void** peb;
asm
{
mov EAX,FS:[0x30];
mov p
