http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/264
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
>
> It looks like the expression is saved, but the saved expression is not
> re-used when passed as a parameter.
>
> Analogous to:
>
> SAVE_EXPR.isintegral(this.sym.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Johannes Pfau from comment #0)
> Reduced from a DDMD build regression:
>
> We've got a function getMemtype which has side effects and returns a class
> object Bar which has a virtual function isin
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |High
Severity|normal
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
Bug ID: 248
Summary: Regression: Call result not properly saved when
calling a vtbl function
Product: GDC
Version: development
Hardware: All
OS: All
