http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Is the library different between 4.9.0 and 4.9.2?
Either the align was added to the library, or the compiler started doing what
the code requested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching al
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
--- Comment #1 from vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
Found a fix: If I go into phobos' epoll.d and change align(1) to align(8),
everything works.
According to this thread
(https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/4565) ARM systems require
64-bi
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
vlevenf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |ARM
OS|All
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
Bug ID: 214
Summary: memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0
Product: GDC
Version: development
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
vlevenf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlevenf...@gmail.com
--
You are r
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202
--- Comment #13 from Iain Buclaw ---
It looks like it is a front-end bug. But GDC does no better by listening to
TemplateInstance::needsCodegen()
Why it returns true in the working and false in the broken case, I have no
idea. Ask Kenji, but I
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 20:54:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 2 Mar 2016 9:09 pm, "asdf via D.gnu"
wrote:
Are there build instructions that don't involve building the
rest of GCC
at the same time? I realize wrong version mismatches are bad
but I'll redo it until it works lol!
Sorry, no