[Bug 214] memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0

2016-03-03 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw --- Is the library different between 4.9.0 and 4.9.2? Either the align was added to the library, or the compiler started doing what the code requested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching al

[Bug 214] memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0

2016-03-03 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 --- Comment #1 from vlevenf...@gmail.com --- Found a fix: If I go into phobos' epoll.d and change align(1) to align(8), everything works. According to this thread (https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/4565) ARM systems require 64-bi

[Bug 214] memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0

2016-03-03 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 vlevenf...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|All |ARM OS|All

[Bug 214] New: memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0

2016-03-03 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 Bug ID: 214 Summary: memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0 Product: GDC Version: development Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical

[Bug 214] memory aligment issue ARM builds after 4.9.0

2016-03-03 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 vlevenf...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vlevenf...@gmail.com -- You are r

[Bug 202] Undefined reference to libcurl functions with small program (not explicitly using network).

2016-03-03 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202 --- Comment #13 from Iain Buclaw --- It looks like it is a front-end bug. But GDC does no better by listening to TemplateInstance::needsCodegen() Why it returns true in the working and false in the broken case, I have no idea. Ask Kenji, but I

Re: Building GDC

2016-03-03 Thread asdf via D.gnu
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 20:54:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 2 Mar 2016 9:09 pm, "asdf via D.gnu" wrote: Are there build instructions that don't involve building the rest of GCC at the same time? I realize wrong version mismatches are bad but I'll redo it until it works lol! Sorry, no