Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
Am Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:46:41 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" : > @Johannes, I've created a GDC team on semaphoreci, will add you to it > along with the build configuration I've set-up so far. I imagine > this will be rolled out tomorrow. Let's see how this goes... Sounds great! My semapho

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 23 June 2015 at 20:05, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 17:48:23 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> >> So it is possible to manage the `.semaphore-cache` directory in a >> scriptable way then? I'm thinking in terms of checking whether a tarball >> exists either downloa

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Anastasov via D.gnu
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 17:48:23 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: So it is possible to manage the `.semaphore-cache` directory in a scriptable way then? I'm thinking in terms of checking whether a tarball exists either downloading or extracting based on the outcome. Yes, the directory is always

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
Am Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:37:40 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" : > On 22 June 2015 at 19:58, Johannes Pfau via D.gnu > wrote: > > Am Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:56:53 + > > schrieb "Iain Buclaw" : > > > >> As the autotester seems to be broken indefinitely for the time > >> being, I've been playin

Re: GDC phobos source path

2015-06-23 Thread Dicebot via D.gnu
https://github.com/Dicebot/Arch-PKGBUILDs/blob/master/gdc/folders.diff

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 23 June 2015 at 18:40, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 14:57:55 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 23 June 2015 at 12:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >>> On 23 June 2015 at 10:15, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu >>> wrote: >>> On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iai

Re: GDC phobos source path

2015-06-23 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
Am Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:37:35 + schrieb "John Colvin" : > How does gdc know where to look for druntime/phobos source code? > I successfully built gdc for the first time on OS X, but it's > looking at completely the wrong source code. > > I have gdc manually (i.e. make install) installed in /

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Anastasov via D.gnu
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 14:57:55 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 June 2015 at 12:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 June 2015 at 10:15, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu wrote: On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: So, I'd be willing to hear of alternatives: https://semaphoreci.c

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 23 June 2015 at 17:28, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 23 June 2015 at 16:57, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> On 23 June 2015 at 12:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> On 23 June 2015 at 10:15, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu >>> wrote: On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > So, I'd be

GDC phobos source path

2015-06-23 Thread John Colvin via D.gnu
How does gdc know where to look for druntime/phobos source code? I successfully built gdc for the first time on OS X, but it's looking at completely the wrong source code. I have gdc manually (i.e. make install) installed in /opt/gdc and ldc installed via homebrew in /usr/local, but when I try

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 23 June 2015 at 16:57, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 23 June 2015 at 12:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> On 23 June 2015 at 10:15, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu >> wrote: >>> On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: So, I'd be willing to hear of alternatives: https://se

[Bug 192] New: Missing folders

2015-06-23 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192 Bug ID: 192 Summary: Missing folders Product: GDC Version: development Hardware: x86_64 OS: OSX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Normal

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 23 June 2015 at 12:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 23 June 2015 at 10:15, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu > wrote: >> On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> >>> So, I'd be willing to hear of alternatives: >>> >>> https://semaphoreci.com - However CPU's given are 2, and time to

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 23 June 2015 at 10:15, Marko Anastasov via D.gnu wrote: > On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> So, I'd be willing to hear of alternatives: >> >> https://semaphoreci.com - However CPU's given are 2, and time to build >> and run tests is limited to 60 minutes. > > >

Re: [Testing] Using Travis CI (or better alternative) for master/branch/PR testing

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Anastasov via D.gnu
On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:56:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: So, I'd be willing to hear of alternatives: https://semaphoreci.com - However CPU's given are 2, and time to build and run tests is limited to 60 minutes. Hi Iain, Semaphore cofounder here. The first point is correct, however the