On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:40:16 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
> On 18 February 2015 at 22:31, ketmar via D.gnu
> wrote:
>> (ah, well, you can't even build shared phobos with GDC yet), and...
>>
>>
> True story, GDC got there first with shared library support before D2
> was released. *Then* D
On 18 February 2015 at 22:31, ketmar via D.gnu wrote:
> (ah, well, you can't even build shared phobos with GDC yet), and...
>
True story, GDC got there first with shared library support before D2
was released. *Then* D2 came out with TLS on by default for all
static data. Shared libraries sudde
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:13:04 +, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 19:24:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> GDC and DMD are not ABI compatible. There are many reasons why this is
>> so, but the one that is likely affecting you is because DMD emits
>> references to symbols that do
On 18 February 2015 at 22:13, Jeremy DeHaan via D.gnu
wrote:
> On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 19:24:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> GDC and DMD are not ABI compatible. There are many reasons why this
>> is so, but the one that is likely affecting you is because DMD emits
>> references to symbols
On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 19:24:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
GDC and DMD are not ABI compatible. There are many reasons why
this
is so, but the one that is likely affecting you is because DMD
emits
references to symbols that do not exist in GDC's runtime
library.
Iain.
I was thinking abo
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 14:59:19 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Yah. The only gotcha is if you fill up the chain, and it needs
to
realloc/grow the memory. Would only ever happen if you have
deep
levels of try { } catch(e) { throw e; } though
Iain
It could be a gcd compile time para
On 18 February 2015 at 14:54, Liran Zvibel via D.gnu
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 13:07:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> It may be a better solution to have a static TLS pointer that gets
>> new'd upon thread start. Perhaps even make it a pre-allocated array
>> so we might be able t
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 13:07:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
It may be a better solution to have a static TLS pointer that
gets
new'd upon thread start. Perhaps even make it a pre-allocated
array
so we might be able to get chained exceptions working in GDC
runtime.
Iain
I like the id
On 18 February 2015 at 13:38, Timo Sintonen via D.gnu
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 13:07:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 18 February 2015 at 12:34, Timo Sintonen via D.gnu
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 12:12:04 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
You can'
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 13:07:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 February 2015 at 12:34, Timo Sintonen via D.gnu
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 12:12:04 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
You can't throw without a GC allocation currently. I'm open
to
suggestions and patches welcom
On 18 February 2015 at 12:34, Timo Sintonen via D.gnu
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 12:12:04 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>>
>> You can't throw without a GC allocation currently. I'm open to
>> suggestions and patches welcome.
>>
>> See here:
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 12:12:04 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
You can't throw without a GC allocation currently. I'm open to
suggestions and patches welcome.
See here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/blob/master/libphobos/libdruntime/gcc/deh.d#L152
Iain.
I was just goimg
On 18 February 2015 at 11:57, Liran Zvibel via D.gnu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to use exceptions in some cases, but we don't want to allocate
> them when we send them.
> What we do with dmd is create bunch of "static immutable Throwable" members
> in our objects during creation (for every pos
Hi,
We would like to use exceptions in some cases, but we don't want
to allocate them when we send them.
What we do with dmd is create bunch of "static immutable
Throwable" members in our objects during creation (for every
possible case), then we just throw these members in the code.
When co
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 23:21:23 UTC, Mike wrote:
If you're compliling with -nophoboslib, you are also compiling
without the runtime, not just phobos. GDC compiles them in one
library, IIRC.
Therefore, you have to implement those parts of the runtime the
compiler inserts implicitly.
On Tuesday, 17 February 2015 at 22:07:38 UTC, Henri Sundelin
wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to evaluate a possibility to use D for an embedded
case. We want to use the same application base from the high
end to the low end. In this case high end means full Linux
server, and low end must be a
16 matches
Mail list logo
