On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:35:55 +0100, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:07:43 + (UTC)
> schrieb ketmar :
>
>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:48:27 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>>
>> >> Sorry, I already updated the branches as I needed a 4.9.2 backport
>> >> for testing. I should pro
Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:07:43 + (UTC)
schrieb ketmar :
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:48:27 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>
> >> Sorry, I already updated the branches as I needed a 4.9.2 backport
> >> for testing. I should probably think twice about this next time :-)
> >
> > Nah - I shouldn'
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:48:27 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>> Sorry, I already updated the branches as I needed a 4.9.2 backport for
>> testing. I should probably think twice about this next time :-)
>
> Nah - I shouldn't have to have my finger dipped in everything. It's
> just given me a
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:33:50 +0100, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Sorry, I already updated the branches as I needed a 4.9.2 backport for
> testing. I should probably think twice about this next time :-)
i think that it was the right move. this way people who are using gcc 4.9
(me ;-) can test it too. n
On 24 January 2015 at 12:33, Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
wrote:
> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:56:31 +
> schrieb "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" :
>
>> On 24 January 2015 at 11:08, ketmar via D.gnu
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:47:25 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 24 Jan 2015 08:40,
Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:56:31 +
schrieb "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" :
> On 24 January 2015 at 11:08, ketmar via D.gnu
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:47:25 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
> >
> >> On 24 Jan 2015 08:40, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu"
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 24 January 2015 at 11:08, ketmar via D.gnu wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:47:25 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>
>> On 24 Jan 2015 08:40, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:57 + (UTC)
>>> schrieb ketmar :
>>>
>>> > i see that 2.066.1 is landed in GD
On 24 Jan 2015 10:20, "Stefan Frijters via D.gnu"
wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 24 January 2015 at 08:47:33 UTC, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Jan 2015 08:40, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu"
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:57 + (UTC)
>>> schrieb ketmar :
>>>
>>> > i see that 2.066
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:47:25 +, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2015 08:40, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu"
> wrote:
>>
>> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:57 + (UTC)
>> schrieb ketmar :
>>
>> > i see that 2.066.1 is landed in GDC (heh, that was sudden! had to fix
>> > almost all my private p
On Saturday, 24 January 2015 at 08:47:33 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
D.gnu wrote:
On 24 Jan 2015 08:40, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu"
wrote:
Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:57 + (UTC)
schrieb ketmar :
> i see that 2.066.1 is landed in GDC (heh, that was sudden!
> had to fix
> almost all my private patche
On 24 Jan 2015 08:40, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu" wrote:
>
> Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:57 + (UTC)
> schrieb ketmar :
>
> > i see that 2.066.1 is landed in GDC (heh, that was sudden! had to fix
> > almost all my private patches...). is it still in testing stage, or
> > it's already fully usable?
Am Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:57 + (UTC)
schrieb ketmar :
> i see that 2.066.1 is landed in GDC (heh, that was sudden! had to fix
> almost all my private patches...). is it still in testing stage, or
> it's already fully usable? and if it's usable, i believe that it
> worth announcing in "D.annou
13 matches
Mail list logo
