Johannes Pfau:
If you only want to disable TypeInfo for some classes that's
more difficult:
This seems a feature that can be useful in standard D (all
compilers), with an annotation of some kind like @nortti.
Bye,
bearophile
Am Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:15:38 +
schrieb "Mike" :
> On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 15:02:07 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> > Mike:
> >
> >> I'm building some code that is heavily templated. Therefore,
> >> I have many very small classes.
> >
> > This is a non sequitur.
>
> I believe it is because ne
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 15:02:07 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Mike:
I'm building some code that is heavily templated. Therefore,
I have many very small classes.
This is a non sequitur.
I believe it is because nearly every one of the instantiated
template names is appears in the .rodata se
Mike:
I'm building some code that is heavily templated. Therefore, I
have many very small classes.
This is a non sequitur.
Most of my code just uses classes as namespaces calling static
methods and properties.
Aren't structs better for that?
Bye,
bearophile
I'm building some code that is heavily templated. Therefore, I
have many very small classes. I was surprised to see my binaries
growing very large, disproportionately to the amount of code I
was adding. I inspected the binaries with objdump and found
contents of the .rodata section like the
