I'm wondering, if some of you that do development on GDC could
briefly describe how you set up your development environment.
I can build GDC fine, but I can't do the 30-minute build for
every little change. The build script is just a black box to me
right now. How do you guys do incremental
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 17:37:22 UTC, Kevin Lamonte wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 06:59:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
Hello,
In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make
minimal runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way
for users to know at compile-time if a fea
Am Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:37:20 +
schrieb "Kevin Lamonte" :
> On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 06:59:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal
> > runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for
> > users to know at compile-
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 06:59:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
Hello,
In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal
runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for
users to know at compile-time if a feature of the runtime is
supported or not, and more importantly, if t
On 11 October 2014 07:59, Mike via D.gnu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal runtime for
> embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for users to know at compile-time
> if a feature of the runtime is supported or not, and more importantly, if
> they
Hello,
In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal
runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for users
to know at compile-time if a feature of the runtime is supported
or not, and more importantly, if they are explicitly or
implicitly using an unsupported feat