On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:39:29 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
> That's because you are not thinking about the "shipping date" as
> a feature, you are not even considering it as an option.
yes, 'cause FOSS projects has no "shipping dates".
> You will never get 1 single customer if you say "I can do
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 14:50:25 +0200
"Leandro Lucarella via D.gnu" wrote:
> I'm sorry, but at least the Sociomantic example is not a good one to
> defend your point.
ok, two companies. ;-) it still beats "noone".
> GCC releases more or less every year a new minor version. I think
> introducing new
On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 11:19:21 UTC, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:44:20 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
My point being that for the majority of people, the ones that
work on open source projects, large projects, productions for
the
masses, a stable language and a pre
ketmar via D.gnu, el 27 de September a las 15:11 me escribiste:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:47:33 +
> "Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
>
> > I don't think that the gcc team is slow on releasing new releases
> > and patches
> they are much slower than D team.
>
> > I think that on one hand it's true tha
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:44:20 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
> My point being that for the majority of people, the ones that
> work on open source projects, large projects, productions for the
> masses, a stable language and a predictable release cycle, is
> more valuable then a cutting-edge featur
On 28 Sep 2014 09:50, "Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 12:20:01 UTC, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
wrote:
>>
>> On 27 September 2014 13:11, ketmar via D.gnu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:47:33 +
>>> "Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
>>>
I don't think that the gcc team
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 12:20:01 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
D.gnu wrote:
On 27 September 2014 13:11, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:47:33 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
I don't think that the gcc team is slow on releasing new
releases
and patches
they are much slower tha
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 12:12:08 UTC, ketmar via D.gnu
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:47:33 +
"Ledd via D.gnu" wrote:
I don't think that the gcc team is slow on releasing new
releases and patches
they are much slower than D team.
I think that on one hand it's true that D is curr
