http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
Or maybe not... :)
I'm seeing this in the code dump:
{
0 = 42;
}
Ooops!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
Seconded. ICE's are either codegen bugs for valid code, or bad codegen that
should have been stopped at semantic passes.
I'd probably put this into the former.
While the code:
*&S.init.i = 42;
Looks as tho
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Sounds like a toolchain bug, probably invoking the wrong assembler (outside
control of gdc itself).
Are you using a specific download of gdc? Or is it built from source?
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to safety0ff from comment #5)
> Context of this report: it was filed because GDC was failing a dmd test (I
> can't remember which now.)
It wasn't failing the test per say. The test in DMD requires a
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153
--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark ---
Created attachment 76
--> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=76&action=edit
new quick-and-dirty patch
oh, yes, i'm s stupid. here is new patch which touches only backend.
additionally, it e
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
This can be done instead in the backend, so that is OK. (Bonus points, no need
for a frontend global.option flag either)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
