On Monday, 2 June 2014 at 17:27:52 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
And of course without a type qualifier there can't be
transitivity. The
programmer always has to be careful to access struct members,
array members,
and other types 'connected' via indirection with peek/poke.
I too think that a) vol
Am Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:37:04 +
schrieb "Timo Sintonen" :
> I did not yet read the dip but here are some of my thoughts:
>
Thanks for joining this discussion, your input is very appreciated.
> At the old days peripherals were simple. An uart might have a
> control register, a status registe
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126
--- Comment #12 from Johannes Pfau ---
> I've created a "design discussion" around this debate on the D wiki:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Language_design_discussions#volatile
Thanks, that's very useful. I did not even remember that we already had
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126
--- Comment #11 from Mike ---
Ok, clearly I have not fully understood shared semantics.
> In future, the compiler would memoize the loop and go straight for the
> assignment.
>
> mov$12, _D4test4globi(%rip)
That would be very bad for my m
