On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 11:05:57 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Compiler support shouldn't be a problem, library support is
lacking.
How much work would it be to add library support (in
man-days/months)?
Thx,
Per
I would imagine that would vary very significantly depending on
how familiar the pe
Compiler support shouldn't be a problem, library support is
lacking.
How much work would it be to add library support (in
man-days/months)?
Thx,
Per
On 24 March 2014 08:27, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:58:01 -0700
> schrieb Brad Roberts :
>
>> I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most
>> developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a
>> non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC m
On 24 March 2014 09:47, "Nordlöw" wrote:
> Does GDC have sparc solaris backend support?
>
> I'm trying to make my company use D and we have a bunch of legacy
> machines that unfortunately run on sparc-solaris 2.10.
>
> /Per
I spoke to a guy last year at GHM Paris and we discussed porting to
SPARC
Does GDC have sparc solaris backend support?
I'm trying to make my company use D and we have a bunch of legacy
machines that unfortunately run on sparc-solaris 2.10.
/Per
Am Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:58:01 -0700
schrieb Brad Roberts :
> I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most
> developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a
> non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then
> seeing what the GDC changes are would be
On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>> Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700
>> schrieb Brad Roberts :
>>
>>> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>>> >> See
>>> >> https://d.puremagic.com/t
