Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Brad Roberts
On 3/23/14, 3:44 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 March 2014 21:58, Brad Roberts wrote: I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 21:58, Brad Roberts wrote: > I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would > be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and > that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC changes are > would be a typical git

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Brad Roberts
I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC changes are would be a typical git operation: git diff master..GDC. But I can deal

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 > schrieb Brad Roberts : > >> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> >> See >> >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&l

Re: Using Link Time Optimization (LTO)

2014-03-23 Thread Mike
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 07:51:14 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: Some time ago LTO was only supported by the gold linker, so you might need to configure binutils with --enable-gold --enable-plugins --enable-lto GCC should also be compiled with --enable-gold --enable-plugins --enable-lto http:/

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 > schrieb Brad Roberts : > >> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> >> See >> >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&l

Re: Using Link Time Optimization (LTO)

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 07:49, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:14:20 + > schrieb "Mike" : > >> Hello, >> >> I have some code generating the following assembly: >> {OnReset}: >> 810: b508push{r3, lr} >> 812: 20ffmovsr0, #255

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 schrieb Brad Roberts : > On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: > >> See > >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13 > >> > >> (Didn't see this in my local tests, i

Re: Using Link Time Optimization (LTO)

2014-03-23 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:14:20 + schrieb "Mike" : > Hello, > > I have some code generating the following assembly: > {OnReset}: > 810: b508push{r3, lr} > 812: 20ffmovsr0, #255; 0xff > 814: f000 f828 bl 86