Re: Unable to compile gdc with gcc 4.8.2 on OSX 10.8.5

2013-11-07 Thread kahuna
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 07:00:56 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 06:07:53 UTC, kahuna wrote: It seems that latest version available from bitbucket Are your previous build attempts also from BitBucket-hosted code? The most up-to-date GDC source is on

Re: Found one (the?) ARM bug: (Pointer) aliasing issues

2013-11-07 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:14:59 + schrieb Iain Buclaw : > On 3 November 2013 10:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > > Am Sun, 3 Nov 2013 02:10:20 + > > schrieb Iain Buclaw : > > > > > last time I > > > checked, returning 0 disables aliasing rules from taking effect. > > > > That should work. Alias

Re: Found one (the?) ARM bug: (Pointer) aliasing issues

2013-11-07 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 3 November 2013 10:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sun, 3 Nov 2013 02:10:20 + > schrieb Iain Buclaw : > > > last time I > > checked, returning 0 disables aliasing rules from taking effect. > > That should work. Alias set 0 is a special alias set which conflicts > with everything. I'll check

Re: Build problem with latest git head

2013-11-07 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 7 November 2013 08:59, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 04/11/13 12:26, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 4 November 2013 11:22, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < >> joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net >> > wrote: >> Should we expect that gi

Re: Build problem with latest git head

2013-11-07 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 04/11/13 12:26, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 4 November 2013 11:22, Joseph Rushton Wakeling mailto:joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net>> wrote: Should we expect that git-head GDC will start to require GCC 4.9 in the near future? After I push the fix that you see in that patch, yes. Am I right tha

Re: Unable to compile gdc with gcc 4.8.2 on OSX 10.8.5

2013-11-07 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 7 November 2013 07:00, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 06:07:53 UTC, kahuna wrote: > >> It seems that latest version available from bitbucket >> > > Are your previous build attempts also from BitBucket-hosted code? The most > up-t