On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:51:07 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 10:49:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 02/11/13 04:56, kahuna wrote:
I have compiled it with gcc-4.8.1, but anyway it should
bootstrap itself.
Just to avoid doubt, I want to be
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:51:07 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 10:49:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 02/11/13 04:56, kahuna wrote:
I have compiled it with gcc-4.8.1, but anyway it should
bootstrap itself.
Just to avoid doubt, I want to be
On Monday, 4 November 2013 at 11:21:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
For the time being, use gcc-4.9-20131013.tar.bz2 snapshot -
that is the
last build I've done here (currently all my time is being used
up on D
2.064).
Feel free to send patches though (see this two line change here:
http://gcc.g
On 4 November 2013 11:22, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 04/11/13 12:20, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> For the time being, use gcc-4.9-20131013.tar.bz2 snapshot - that is the
>> last
>> build I've done here (currently all my time is being used up on D 2.064).
>>
>
>
On 04/11/13 12:20, Iain Buclaw wrote:
For the time being, use gcc-4.9-20131013.tar.bz2 snapshot - that is the last
build I've done here (currently all my time is being used up on D 2.064).
Should we expect that git-head GDC will start to require GCC 4.9 in the near
future?
On 4 November 2013 10:15, Timo Sintonen wrote:
> I tried to build gdc with the latest heads of gcc and gdc
> Lots of warnings along the build and the it stops here:
>
> ../../gcc/gcc/d/d-objfile.cc:2031:52: error: no matching function for
> call to 'symtab_node::symtab_node(cgraph_node*&)'
>
I tried to build gdc with the latest heads of gcc and gdc
Lots of warnings along the build and the it stops here:
../../gcc/gcc/d/d-objfile.cc:2031:52: error: no matching function
for call to 'symtab_node::symtab_node(cgraph_node*&)'
symtab_add_to_same_comdat_group ((symtab_node) thunk_nod
