On 16 September 2013 00:15, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:52:29 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>>
>> LDC does not strip the library into
>
>
> s/strip/split/
>
I knew what you meant. :o)
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
On 15 September 2013 23:01, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:30:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> As per my initial post, strip not being ran on the library after
>> installation. :-)
>>
>> The makefile for libphobos/libdruntime certainly doesn't strip the
>> libraries for you wh
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:52:29 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
LDC does not strip the library into
s/strip/split/
David
On 15 September 2013 23:48, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 22:30:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> If the size of the library is 70MB+ then it most certainly isn't
>> running --strip-debug on the library. I can guarantee you at least
>> this. :-)
>
>
> It is 18Mb (you are probabl
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 22:30:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
If the size of the library is 70MB+ then it most certainly isn't
running --strip-debug on the library. I can guarantee you at
least
this. :-)
It is 18Mb (you are probably mixing my posts with Joseph ones,
they are unrelated)
On 15 September 2013 23:01, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:30:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> As per my initial post, strip not being ran on the library after
>> installation. :-)
>>
>> The makefile for libphobos/libdruntime certainly doesn't strip the
>> libraries for you wh
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:30:17 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
As per my initial post, strip not being ran on the library after
installation. :-)
The makefile for libphobos/libdruntime certainly doesn't strip
the
libraries for you when you make strip-install. At least not
yet...
As per my
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 19:48:12 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Is there any way in which to ensure that the build splits
Phobos up into library and debugging symbols à la LDC? Could
be useful, no?
LDC does not strip the library into a release build and debugging
symbols (yet) –
On 15 September 2013 22:07, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:05:18 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> --strip-unneeded could potentially cause lots of undefined reference
>> errors on static libraries. Shared libraries don't suffer this
>> because symbols are put into a special sect
On 15 September 2013 22:05, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 15 September 2013 21:02, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 19:59:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 September 2013 20:46, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 18:09:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 21:05:18 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
--strip-unneeded could potentially cause lots of undefined
reference
errors on static libraries. Shared libraries don't suffer this
because symbols are put into a special section which strip
knows not
to touch.
General rule of
On 15 September 2013 21:02, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 19:59:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 15 September 2013 20:46, Dicebot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 18:09:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
du -h lib64/libgphobos2.a
73Mlib64/libgph
On Sunday, 15 September 2013 at 19:59:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 15 September 2013 20:46, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 18:09:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
du -h lib64/libgphobos2.a
73Mlib64/libgphobos2.a
strip --strip-unneeded lib64/libgphobos2.a
du -h lib64/libgphobo
On 15 September 2013 20:46, Dicebot wrote:
> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 18:09:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> du -h lib64/libgphobos2.a
>> 73Mlib64/libgphobos2.a
>>
>> strip --strip-unneeded lib64/libgphobos2.a
>>
>> du -h lib64/libgphobos2.a
>> 18Mlib64/libgphobos2.a
>
>
> Well, lo
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 18:09:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
du -h lib64/libgphobos2.a
73Mlib64/libgphobos2.a
strip --strip-unneeded lib64/libgphobos2.a
du -h lib64/libgphobos2.a
18Mlib64/libgphobos2.a
Well, looks like you have just found a bug in default Arch Linux
makepkg.conf
15 matches
Mail list logo