http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
--- Comment #5 from Paul Jurczak 2013-08-21 13:20:07
UTC ---
I added the files you requested, but they are syntactically different: assembly
vs. D. I will be glad to run the new gdc version when available.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
Paul Jurczak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52|-fdump-tree-original for|-fdump-tree-original for
descriptio
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
--- Comment #4 from Paul Jurczak 2013-08-21 13:12:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 52
--> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=52
-fdump-tree-original for gcc 4.8
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
--- Comment #3 from Paul Jurczak 2013-08-21 13:11:41
UTC ---
Created attachment 51
--> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=51
-fdump-tree-original for gdc 4.6
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-08-21 12:49:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This has probably little to do with GDC itself, but is related to changes in
> std.conv module. I could measure it only with gdc, hence I reported it here.
Th
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
--- Comment #1 from Paul Jurczak 2013-08-21 10:05:59
UTC ---
This has probably little to do with GDC itself, but is related to changes in
std.conv module. I could measure it only with gdc, hence I reported it here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
Bug #: 75
Summary: 4x performance regression of to!(char[]) from gcd 4.6
to 4.8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: 4.8.x
Platform: x86_64
OS/Ver
