gdc-4.8 branch

2013-07-08 Thread Johannes Pfau
I wanted to update the gdc-4.8 branch and I surprisingly got many merge conflicts. I think this is because we used rebase on the master branch now and then. So are there any gdc-4.8 specific commits in that branch or could I just delete the branch and recreate it from master? The github branch co

[Bug 70] dtor / destructor not called for (rvalue) struct used in opApply

2013-07-08 Thread gdc-bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 70] dtor / destructor not called for (rvalue) struct used in opApply

2013-07-08 Thread gdc-bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 --- Comment #3 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-08 17:41:18 UTC --- I cross-linked both reports, so if either of you compiler devs finds out what the issue is you can share it with the other team. That's all. So far on the LDC side it only reads "I

[Bug 70] dtor / destructor not called for (rvalue) struct used in opApply

2013-07-08 Thread gdc-bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-07-08 17:34:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > See also: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/426 No, I will not see also. :P -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?ta

Re: gcc 4.8.1 made it to Debian Sid

2013-07-08 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 07/08/2013 11:43 AM, eles wrote: > Well, it worked! Thanks a lot! Excellent. :-) > I never properly succeed into accomplishing all these steps. It patched, but > it > never compiled to the end. Thank you for the new method. I also struggled for a long time with patching the sources. I suspe

[Bug 71] New: ICE with std.algorith.uniq

2013-07-08 Thread gdc-bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71 Bug #: 71 Summary: ICE with std.algorith.uniq Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Se

Re: gcc 4.8.1 made it to Debian Sid

2013-07-08 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 07/08/2013 11:45 AM, eles wrote: > Just me alone, I do not feel that I have enough time and competence to do > that. > But, what about to form a venture, the three of us? (JRW, HST and me, Iain > already has a lot of job to do) > > The goal would be to D-ify the gdmd. > > I will learn some Pe

[Bug 70] dtor / destructor not called for (rvalue) struct used in opApply

2013-07-08 Thread gdc-bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 --- Comment #1 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-08 10:02:32 UTC --- See also: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/426 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug 70] New: dtor / destructor not called for (rvalue) struct used in opApply

2013-07-08 Thread gdc-bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Bug #: 70 Summary: dtor / destructor not called for (rvalue) struct used in opApply Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64

Re: gcc 4.8.1 made it to Debian Sid

2013-07-08 Thread eles
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 18:12:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 07/05/2013 08:03 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote: Wait, we're trying to D-ify gdmd? It was a suggestion of Iain's when he forked it off into a separate repo. Seems like a good idea -- demonstrates D's capabilities, probably make

Re: gcc 4.8.1 made it to Debian Sid

2013-07-08 Thread eles
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 16:35:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 07/05/2013 04:40 PM, eles wrote: On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 13:45:30 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 07/05/2013 03:34 PM, eles wrote: Ubuntu 13.04. I have also compiled GDC successfully using 4.8.1 on a cluster in