On 2 June 2013 17:22, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 15:07:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as anti-spam is
>> next to useless and it would probably not be very beneficial to prevent
>> people documenting from creating ne
On 2 June 2013 17:22, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 15:07:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as anti-spam is
>> next to useless and it would probably not be very beneficial to prevent
>> people documenting from creating ne
On 06/02/2013 06:22 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> (And, yes, I have an excuse for procrastinating here on the GDC
> forums: Code's compiling. :P)
Hey, no excuses. LDC is MUCH quicker to compile than GDC is ;-)
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2013-06-02 17:23:46
UTC ---
I think this would also fail for delegate types as well, as
TypeDelegate::toArgTypes is identical.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59
Bug #: 59
Summary: X32 - Type *argtypemerge(): Assertion `0' failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: All
Stat
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 15:07:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as
anti-spam is next to useless and it would probably not be very
beneficial to prevent people documenting from creating new
pages.
So, to sanitise the current situation but sti
On 2 June 2013 16:57, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 06/02/2013 05:07 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as anti-spam is
>> next to
>> useless and it would probably not be very beneficial to prevent people
>> documenting from creating new pages
On 06/02/2013 05:07 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as anti-spam is next
> to
> useless and it would probably not be very beneficial to prevent people
> documenting from creating new pages.
>
> So, to sanitise the current situation but still be op
Evidently, putting up a wiki in MoinMoin was a bad idea, as
anti-spam is next to useless and it would probably not be very
beneficial to prevent people documenting from creating new pages.
So, to sanitise the current situation but still be open to anyone
wishing to contribute to the documentat
On 2 June 2013 05:52, arnuld wrote:
> I am primarily a C developer and have 3 years of industrial experience in
> it, mostly have written sockets API related stuff along with application
> development. Have worked in C++ too but that is more of personal interest
> than industrial work. Got interes
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fro
On 2013-06-01 11:53, David Nadlinger wrote:
Yep. It's a bit cumbersome to handle, though, as it relies on Blocks
support:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/druntime/blob/2c78290fff65f2fce763da4b077856a2fc7596fb/src/ldc/osx_tls.c#L36
Oh, I didn't noticed it used blocks.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Bug reported as #58
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58
I have added the output from feqrel to the report.
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 08:28:42 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
The same code passes without assertion when compiled with DMD.
Please file a bug report on bugzilla.gdcproject.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58
Bug #: 58
Summary: std.math.pow produces incorrect results when used with
std.parallelism
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: 4.8.x
Platform: x86
Am Sun, 02 Jun 2013 07:17:12 +0200
schrieb "finalpatch" :
> the following code compiled with GDC shows the bug
> (I'm using the gcc 4.8 windows mingw32 version from
> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads)
>
> import std.math;
> import std.stdio;
> import std.range;
> import std.parallelis
15 matches
Mail list logo
