On 26 March 2013 18:30, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:26:10 +
> schrieb Iain Buclaw :
>
> > On 25 March 2013 18:36, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> >
> > > In runnable/test42.d test7290 checks if a scope delegate is really
> > > allocated on the stack. To verify this it obtains the EB
On 03/26/2013 07:13 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> That's good news! I've been unable to get 4.8 to build in my Debian
> system (probably due to some system- or configuration-specific breakages
> somewhere... Debian multiarch isn't playing nice with GCC's build
> scripts). Having the latest frontend avail
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:36:16 +
> schrieb Iain Buclaw :
>
> > >
> > >
> > Guaranteed is not the right word, but future releases of the frontend
> > will be present only on 4.9. Though, people are free to backport to
> > 4.8 or 4.
Am Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:26:10 +
schrieb Iain Buclaw :
> On 25 March 2013 18:36, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>
> > In runnable/test42.d test7290 checks if a scope delegate is really
> > allocated on the stack. To verify this it obtains the EBP pointer
> > and compares that to the delegates .ptr.
> >
Am Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:36:16 +
schrieb Iain Buclaw :
> >
> >
> Guaranteed is not the right word, but future releases of the frontend
> will be present only on 4.9. Though, people are free to backport to
> 4.8 or 4.7, as Johannes has done in the past.
FYI I'll also try to continue updating th
On 26 March 2013 16:09, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 03:44 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > This is why there are gdc-4.7, gdc-4.8 branches. They are there to be
> > guaranteed to work with those gcc releases. There won't be any support
> for
> > multi
On 03/26/2013 03:44 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This is why there are gdc-4.7, gdc-4.8 branches. They are there to be
> guaranteed to work with those gcc releases. There won't be any support for
> multiple gcc versions in one source.
I think you've misunderstood me (although I don't think I express
On 26 March 2013 12:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 01:13 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8 (and below)
> cross
> > compilers out there? Like the console toolchains.
>
> Also ... how will that affect t
On 03/23/2013 01:13 PM, Manu wrote:
> Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8 (and below) cross
> compilers out there? Like the console toolchains.
Also ... how will that affect the ability to compile on Ubuntu using
gcc-snapshot? Working on alpha/beta 13.04 that package has c
Am Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:03:19 +
schrieb Iain Buclaw :
> On 25 March 2013 18:31, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>
> > I think this is a known issue:
> > DMD expects real.stringof to return a string in the %g format.
> > However the GCC function used for formatting real numbers always
> > returns the %e
10 matches
Mail list logo