http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2012-09-26 13:34:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So D doesn't make any guarantees that casting va_list to a pointer is
> portable,
> right?
>
> But what does that mean for the test suite? Change it to use t
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Pfau 2012-09-26 09:26:55
UTC ---
So D doesn't make any guarantees that casting va_list to a pointer is portable,
right?
But what does that mean for the test suite? Change it to use the portable
va_arg or is that test
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #6 from Johannes Pfau 2012-09-26 09:20:06
UTC ---
@Iain: I forgot to explicitly state that, but the test case does indeed not
fail on x86/x86-64, it only fails on ARM. It probably depends on the unwinder
and/or exception ABI.
--
Con
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Alex Rønne Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lycus.org
--- Comment #3 from A