Re: libphobos on ARM

2012-06-11 Thread Trass3r
And I guess 1 means a lot more work but would be the better option apart from that?!

Re: libphobos on ARM

2012-06-11 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 11 June 2012 17:58, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:31:59 -0400 > schrieb Matthew Caron : > >> Judging by: >> >> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/120/fsection-anchors-broken-on-arm >> >> (specifically >> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/120/fsection-anchors-broken-on-

Re: libphobos on ARM

2012-06-11 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:31:59 -0400 schrieb Matthew Caron : > Judging by: > > https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/120/fsection-anchors-broken-on-arm > > (specifically > https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/120/fsection-anchors-broken-on-arm#comment-686378), > > I thought that was fixed.