On 6 June 2012 17:43, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 06/06/12 18:02, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 6 June 2012 16:03, Artur Skawina wrote:
>>> Hmm, is there a way to see the purity level determined by the frontend,
>>> w/o doing any compiler modifications?
>>
>> Unfortunately not. I can tell you that the
On 06/06/12 18:02, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 6 June 2012 16:03, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> Hmm, is there a way to see the purity level determined by the frontend,
>> w/o doing any compiler modifications?
>
> Unfortunately not. I can tell you that the modification would be to
> d-decls.cc:(FuncDeclara
On 6 June 2012 16:03, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 06/06/12 12:14, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 5 June 2012 00:24, Artur Skawina wrote:
>>> On 06/04/12 23:49, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 4 June 2012 21:53, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 06/04/12 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 4 June 2012 19:49, Artu
On 06/06/12 17:03, Artur Skawina wrote:
> I know. What I'm saying is that omitting the "noinline" attribute causes
> the "pure" function, like s.f() above, to be called twice. Add the
> "noinline" back, with no other changes - and it gets called only once.
What i mean by "called" in this case is o
On 06/06/12 12:14, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 5 June 2012 00:24, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> On 06/04/12 23:49, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> On 4 June 2012 21:53, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 06/04/12 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 4 June 2012 19:49, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> Would it be possible to al
On 5 June 2012 00:24, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 06/04/12 23:49, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 4 June 2012 21:53, Artur Skawina wrote:
>>> On 06/04/12 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 4 June 2012 19:49, Artur Skawina wrote:
> Would it be possible to allow give the gcc attribute as a string?
>
