On 1 May 2012 17:31, Daniel Green wrote:
> On 5/1/2012 1:53 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> no _Dmodule_ref would probably mean no object_.d was compiled in.
>>
>
> In D2.058, the _Dmodule_ref code was moved to minfo.d. I didn't properly
> move the GNU specific stuff on the first build, problem didn
On 5/1/2012 1:53 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
no _Dmodule_ref would probably mean no object_.d was compiled in.
In D2.058, the _Dmodule_ref code was moved to minfo.d. I didn't
properly move the GNU specific stuff on the first build, problem didn't
surface until I compiled it with MinGW.
They red
