Re: Compiling with gdc vs. gdmd

2012-04-06 Thread Daniel Green
On 4/6/2012 8:00 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: In fact, the zipped-up wscript is contained within the build script as a binary blob, no? This alone is enough to make it fall under the GPL provisions. An interesting thing to note about the waf binary blob. Currently, it actually extracts

Re: Compiling with gdc vs. gdmd

2012-04-06 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Joseph Rushton Wakeling, el 6 de abril a las 15:00 me escribiste: > On 06/04/12 08:11, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote: > >OK, I understand what you're saying, but I think there's a misunderstanding > >here: With Waf, you *do* write a build script like you do with e.g. Make, and > >this so-called wscrip

etc.c...

2012-04-06 Thread Manu
I have a request for the next binary release of GDC. Can it please contain binaries for the libs in etc.c...? Trying to track down compatible versions of zlib, curl, sqlite for MinGW64 is surprisingly difficult to do! >_< These modules are packaged with phobos as if they're standard issue, so can

Re: Compiling with gdc vs. gdmd

2012-04-06 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 06/04/12 08:11, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote: OK, I understand what you're saying, but I think there's a misunderstanding here: With Waf, you *do* write a build script like you do with e.g. Make, and this so-called wscript sits outside Waf. See for example: https://github.com/lycus/mci/blob/maste

Re: Compiling with gdc vs. gdmd

2012-04-06 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Joseph Rushton Wakeling, el 5 de abril a las 17:42 me escribiste: > On 05/04/12 13:16, Leandro Lucarella wrote: > >Joseph Rushton Wakeling, el 4 de abril a las 15:43 me escribiste: > >>To see why it matters, imagine a corporate entity releasing a large, > >>complex piece of software where the cod