http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1237
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
I'm picking up some old issues from bugzilla, this one is worth
having a community review.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1949
Should hidden GCC features be imported from a magic module
provided by gcc.* packages - or should the implementation be
re-written using pragmas instead?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2012-03-12 08:27:23 PDT ---
After some discussion a while ago, GCC core devs are not too keen on adding yet
another calling convention to i386 on top of what's already supported - that
makes this report a wontfix
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2191
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1755
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1755
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #