Re: GDC Build Failing

2012-02-06 Thread Steve Teale
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:31:40 +, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> > For Ubuntu and Debian, being that i386 and x86_64 (possibly others) are > multi-arch systems, you may need to set-up LIBRARY_PATH and CPATH. > > In ~/.bashrc: > > LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu > CPATH=/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu

Re: GDC Build Failing

2012-02-06 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 6 February 2012 16:14, Steve Teale wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:17:00 +, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 6 February 2012 12:50, Steve Teale >> wrote: >>> I'm having a failure compiling libgcc2.c - fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: >>> No such file or directory. >>> >>> I got round that by copying

Re: GDC Build Failing

2012-02-06 Thread Steve Teale
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:17:00 +, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 6 February 2012 12:50, Steve Teale > wrote: >> I'm having a failure compiling libgcc2.c - fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: >> No such file or directory. >> >> I got round that by copying the file from >> /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/gnu intp

Re: GDC Build Failing

2012-02-06 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 6 February 2012 12:50, Steve Teale wrote: > I'm having a failure compiling libgcc2.c - fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: > No such file or directory. > > I got round that by copying the file from /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/gnu > intp /usr/include/gnu. > > Then the build goes on, but later I get get

Re: GDC Build Failing

2012-02-06 Thread Trass3r
Which distro?

GDC Build Failing

2012-02-06 Thread Steve Teale
I'm having a failure compiling libgcc2.c - fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory. I got round that by copying the file from /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/gnu intp /usr/include/gnu. Then the build goes on, but later I get get: checking dynamic linker characteristics... configure:

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Manu
On 6 February 2012 10:11, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:48:32 -0600 > schrieb Andrew Wiley : > > > > > Actually, if the Android default is to build against softfloat ABI, > > you may be stuck with it. If Android doesn't require hardfloat to run > > and doesn't let developers provid

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Manu
On 6 February 2012 09:40, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Mon, 6 Feb 2012 03:07:31 +0200 > schrieb Manu : > > > On 6 February 2012 02:25, Manu wrote: > > > > > On 6 February 2012 00:04, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > > > > >> Am Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:04:12 +0100 > > >> schrieb Johannes Pfau : > > >> > > >> >

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 6 February 2012 08:11, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:48:32 -0600 > schrieb Andrew Wiley : > >> >> Actually, if the Android default is to build against softfloat ABI, >> you may be stuck with it. If Android doesn't require hardfloat to run >> and doesn't let developers provide mul

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:42:26 -0600 schrieb Andrew Wiley : > > I'm pretty sure you have to rebuild the entire toolchain to switch > from softfloat to hardfloat. I also thought that, but GCC docs say: -with-fpu=type --with-float=type These configure options provide **default** values for the -msche

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:48:32 -0600 schrieb Andrew Wiley : > > Actually, if the Android default is to build against softfloat ABI, > you may be stuck with it. If Android doesn't require hardfloat to run > and doesn't let developers provide multiple binaries for different > platforms (which it might

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Andrew Wiley
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Mon, 6 Feb 2012 03:07:31 +0200 > schrieb Manu : > >> On 6 February 2012 02:25, Manu wrote: >> >> > On 6 February 2012 00:04, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> > >> >> Am Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:04:12 +0100 >> >> schrieb Johannes Pfau : >> >> >> >> > I w

Re: [Tutorial][Binaries] gdc for android

2012-02-06 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 6 February 2012 01:07, Manu wrote: > On 6 February 2012 02:25, Manu wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 00:04, Johannes Pfau wrote: >>> >>> Am Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:04:12 +0100 >>> schrieb Johannes Pfau : >>> >>> > I will probably need some more time to get this working... >>> > >>> >>> I have some