Re: GDC Updated to 2.055/1.070

2011-09-23 Thread maarten van damme
It would certainly help having all distro quirks and dependencies dealth with. Having a very easy built process will help making more people use gdc and help avoiding people like me :p 2011/9/23 Adam Burton > dsimcha wrote: > Once you have a package it's easy enough to `apt-get source`/download

Re: GDC Updated to 2.055/1.070

2011-09-23 Thread Adam Burton
dsimcha wrote: > == Quote from maarten van damme (maartenvd1...@gmail.com)'s article >> I hope gdc (for D2) gets included in gcc so I can simply download it from >> synaptic :D > > I don't think this will ever be a good solution. The glacial and > centralized > nature of Linux packaging conflict

Re: GDC Updated to 2.055/1.070

2011-09-23 Thread maarten van damme
2011/9/23 dsimcha > I don't think this will ever be a good solution. The glacial and > centralized > nature of Linux packaging conflicts with the fast-moving nature of D. For > example, when I write D code I don't make even the slightest effort to > support any > compiler/phobos/druntime versio

Re: GDC Updated to 2.055/1.070

2011-09-23 Thread dsimcha
== Quote from maarten van damme (maartenvd1...@gmail.com)'s article > I hope gdc (for D2) gets included in gcc so I can simply download it from > synaptic :D I don't think this will ever be a good solution. The glacial and centralized nature of Linux packaging conflicts with the fast-moving natur

Re: GDC Updated to 2.055/1.070

2011-09-23 Thread maarten van damme
I've created those symlinks and now libgomp is failing :s I hope gdc (for D2) gets included in gcc so I can simply download it from synaptic :D 2011/9/23 Trass3r > I had similar problems on debian testing x86_64. Apparently some files have >> been moved and this causes those problems. For exampl