Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:33:07 +, Iain Buclaw wrote: > First and last work here (then again, I'm prodding with a > distribution-patched copy of dragonegg here). Second segfaults, but > looks to be a problem with the plugin, rather than anything gdc could > do. > > Anyway, enough distraction for

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

== Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:27 +, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:25:24 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > >> > So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:27 +, Iain Buclaw wrote: > == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:25:24 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >> > So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried it with DragonEgg >> > though (first time I've heard about it too

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

== Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:25:24 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > > So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried it with DragonEgg > > though (first time I've heard about it too). > I compiled both gdc and dragonegg together cleanly, whic

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

== Quote from Iain Buclaw (ibuc...@ubuntu.com)'s article > == Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article > > == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > > > Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? > > > Or even better, already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:25:24 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried it with DragonEgg > though (first time I've heard about it too). I compiled both gdc and dragonegg together cleanly, which is nice that the patches they both required to gcc-4.5.2 don't

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

So far 4.5.2 works for me on XP. I've never tried it with DragonEgg though (first time I've heard about it too).

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article > == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > > Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? > > Or even better, already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the LLVM > > plugin). > > I know about LDC2 of course, but DragonEgg

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

== Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:31:14 +, dsimcha wrote: > > == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > >> Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? Or even better, > >> already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:31:14 +, dsimcha wrote: > == Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article >> Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? Or even better, >> already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the LLVM plugin). >> I know about LDC2 of course, but DragonEgg would

Re: gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

== Quote from Jason E. Aten (j.e.a...@gmail.com)'s article > Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? > Or even better, already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the LLVM > plugin). > I know about LDC2 of course, but DragonEgg would obviate the need for it > because DragonEgg makes LLVM

gcc 4.5.2 or DragonEgg for GDC?

Has anyone ported GDC over to gcc 4.5.2 by chance? Or even better, already gotten GDC to work with DragonEgg (the LLVM plugin). I know about LDC2 of course, but DragonEgg would obviate the need for it because DragonEgg makes LLVM codegen a plugin to the GCC framework. If not I may try to get t