Re: Adding gdc to gcc

2010-11-16 Thread Walter Bright
Jerry Quinn wrote: Even if the licensing issues are sorted out today, I don't think it can realistically be added to the gcc source tree before 4.7. It's ok, we're in this for the long haul.

Re: Building an ARM cross compiler

2010-11-16 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am 15.11.2010, 21:27 Uhr, schrieb Iain Buclaw : == Quote from Iain Buclaw (ibuc...@ubuntu.com)'s article There's a patch in Debian which addresses this. Last time I tried (a nice fella allowed me to work via ssh'ing onto a sheevaplug) it mostly works, but you'll need to use the gcstub source

Re: Win64/MinGW

2010-11-16 Thread Anders F Björklund
Iain Buclaw wrote: As far as I'm aware, for GCC4 on MinGW, you need to build MPFR and GMP first to link against the compiler, else it just won't run. Seems like it was changed in GCC 4.3.0. For GCC 4.2.1, you only needed to include MPFR and GMP if you were building the Fortran frontend... Easi

Re: Win64/MinGW

2010-11-16 Thread Iain Buclaw
== Quote from Anders F Björklund (a...@algonet.se)'s article > >> I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I > >> understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm > >> trying to > >> decide if it's worth the effort. What is the status of MinGW for 64-bit

Re: Win64/MinGW

2010-11-16 Thread Anders F Björklund
I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm trying to decide if it's worth the effort. What is the status of MinGW for 64-bit Windows? Is there any theoretical reason why 64-bit GDC for MinGW shouldn't work