Iain Buclaw wrote:
> It worked up until the 1.064 Phobos merge it seems. The current changeset
> should
> have that fixed now, though is probably a sign that should really have more
> 64bit
> testers for GDC.
>
Yes, it works now.
Thanks,
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber..
> Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > =3D=3D Quote from "J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me M. Berger" (jeber...@free.fr)'s art=
> icle
> >>Hi,
> >>I'm officially deprecating the old ArchLinux gdc-svn package.
> >> Instead I've uploaded two packages: gdc1-hg [1] and gdc2-hg [2] for
> >> D1 and D2 respectively.
> >>It
Iain Buclaw wrote:
> == Quote from "Jérôme M. Berger" (jeber...@free.fr)'s article
>> Hi,
>> I'm officially deprecating the old ArchLinux gdc-svn package.
>> Instead I've uploaded two packages: gdc1-hg [1] and gdc2-hg [2] for
>> D1 and D2 respectively.
>> It appears that Tango is not
== Quote from "Jérôme M. Berger" (jeber...@free.fr)'s article
> Hi,
> I'm officially deprecating the old ArchLinux gdc-svn package.
> Instead I've uploaded two packages: gdc1-hg [1] and gdc2-hg [2] for
> D1 and D2 respectively.
> It appears that Tango is not compatible with recent
== Quote from "Jérôme M. Berger" (jeber...@free.fr)'s article
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enig4343E2F2AF5496438B0DC11D
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I'm not sure if it is related, but
Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Strange, I thought I fixed this in commit 282, but according to history it got
> reverted back in 288 by accident. Thanks for letting us know!
>
I'm not sure if it is related, but the following code prints "NOK":
8<
import std.s
Hi,
I'm officially deprecating the old ArchLinux gdc-svn package.
Instead I've uploaded two packages: gdc1-hg [1] and gdc2-hg [2] for
D1 and D2 respectively.
It appears that Tango is not compatible with recent versions of
gdc: I get this message: "mismatch between dmd and
