Re: Where is object.d? Will it work on 10.6?

2009-11-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote: An easy hack is to run gdc under strace and look to the path it wants to have the phobos lib (this is the error) But you would need to use ktrace on Mac OS X 10.4 and earlier, or dtrace on Mac OS X 10.5 and later. Since strace is for Linux. --anders

Re: GDC installers

2009-11-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote: Once the project has been successfully restarted, some new installers could be made - if desired ? Of course we would like to support all the operating system you listed. But i see two main problems on it: 1) developers, we are not too much, but we are rising ;) Not

Re: Where is object.d? Will it work on 10.6?

2009-11-03 Thread Vincenzo Ampolo
al wrote: > So far I know it's because it can't find includes, but I don't know where > it expects them. An easy hack is to run gdc under strace and look to the path it wants to have the phobos lib (this is the error) Unfortunately Mac installer is not supported by us cuz nobody, of the dev t

Re: GDC installers

2009-11-03 Thread Vincenzo Ampolo
Anders F Björklund wrote: > It could need another update now, to work with: > Windows 7, Fedora 12, Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow"... > So far those have been pending the upgrades of > GCC, to MinGW/FSF GCC 4.3.x and Apple GCC 4.2.1 > > > http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/ > > Once the project has been su

Re: GDC installers

2009-11-03 Thread Vincenzo Ampolo
Anders F Björklund wrote: > But some prefer tarballs, so you might want to be doing both ? In trunk there is already a script which makes tarballs, it should already work too (i didn't test). it's here: https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/src/tip/d/package/simple.sh ;) I didn't proceded in dis

Re: GDC installers

2009-11-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Michael P. wrote: http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/ Once the project has been successfully restarted, some new installers could be made - if desired ? We will do our best to make some installers for GDC soon. Nice, then I won't even have to bother with repackaging them. But some prefer tar