I just added inline_module's and submitted a PR today here:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/555
My intent was something like OpenCL's JIT/AOC compilation (PyCUDA/PyOpenCL
also work this way) which is simple and high performance, and I saw cython
had this capability and just needed a little b
Accidentally posted to an already-opened tab for the cython-users ML
yesterday, moving to here. Following up from a github opened issue here:
https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/1440
I was hoping we could give a way to drop straight into C/C++ inside of
Cython pyx files.
Why?
-It [helps] av
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> > Accidentally posted to an already-opened tab for the cython-users ML
> > yesterday, moving to here. Following up from a github opened issue here:
> >
> >
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jason Newton wrote:
> > You must realize that almost any other python driven way to compile
> c-code
> > in the spirit these projects do is deprecated/dead. Cython has absorbed
> all
&
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> Especially with respect to C++, we've always tried to make things safe and
> helpful that Cython can support directly, and to make things possible that
> are too complex to handle safely. But I agree with Robert that allowing
> arbitrary C
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 21.08.2016 um 11:11:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> >> PyInline's last news update was in 2004 where the author gives a "Hats
> of[f]
> >> to PyRex", prior to that only a few blog en
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Ian Henriksen <
insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Remember - cython is "the way" that comes up for how to glue C/C++ into
>> python these days, not just the program in cish python frontend for speed.
>>
>>
> There's some truth to the issues you raise
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> In my experience Cython has generally been fairly easy to pick up for
> people who already know Python. And Python often easy to pick up for
> people who already know C/C++. Of course for many wrappings it often
> takes non-trivial knowl
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > To clarify, I'm coming from the case where I
> > didn't read the whole tutorial/docs before being faced with pyx in the
> > projects I previously mentioned, while on tight turn around time - I was
> not
> > able to grok in that context.
>
> > I have another idea/iteration to run by you then. One of your chief
> > quibbles, although I don't think it's your underlying one, is Cython must
> > understand what's going on. So how about we support a block of C/C++
> code
> > as a proper construct. Same name but now, I guess braces may
Just trying and improve the state of the art. Yea maybe we have to add
some tricks to separate the two grammar wise, so they can play together.
Besides, I didn't start with that complexity, it evolved into seeing if
that was a viable path forward.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Alex S. wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
