On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:37 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On a side note, ipython is not something I usually trust to test
> things out, as it gets things wrong sometimes which can seriously make
> you question your own sanity.
I should note that we'd love to know specifics about problems that
se
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> Apologies, it was indeed a rather vague comment. I had some issues
No worries.
> with pasting unicode characters a few years back that would get
> incorrect codepoints in ipython but not regular python, but I'm afraid
We had a long and d
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> More on this
> here:
>
> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/1317
Thanks for your persistence! For those on the cython list, it should
be fixed soon, Thomas already has a PR up.
Cheers,
f
_
Hi folks,
[ I'm broadcasting this widely for maximum reach, but I'd appreciate
it if replies can be kept to the *numpy* list, which is sort of the
'base' list for scientific/numerical work. It will make it much
easier to organize a coherent set of notes later on. Apology if
you're subscribed to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:03 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> That's my understanding. Getting US non-profit status is a lot of work to
> start with. I'm not familiar with what it will take for other countries but
> I will bring it up at the next meeting.
At PyCon, we had some brief conversations with
questions, don't hesitate to contact me or one of
the other organizers if you feel they can address your concerns more
directly:
"Fernando Perez"
"Randy LeVeque" (Reproducible research track)
"Hans Petter Langtangen" (Conference co-chair)
Question: would you guys be open to including here:
http://docs.cython.org/src/quickstart/build.html
a note about IPython similar to the Sage one? Something like:
"""
Similarly, in IPython (as of version 0.13) there is also Cython
support that can be used by loading the `cythonmagic` extension.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Yes, once we know what to make of it, please send a pull request.
I'm happy to do so, though I'm not sure I'd be the best one to do real
refactoring of your docs if you want to go that way.
But just let me know and if I can help out, I'll b
First, congratulations and thanks for keeping such an important
project moving forward!!
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> What about making a 0.17 branch, on which we can do 0.17.1, etc. if
> necessary. I don't think we're to the point of needing to backport our
> bugfi
--
Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org)
fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists only (I ignore this when swamped!)
fernando.perez-at-berkeley: contact me here for any direct mail
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
https
10 matches
Mail list logo
